Breakdowns are reported by phone
A request arrives as a call, gets written on a board, and its history exists only in the memory of whoever took it.
Reactive requests and preventive plans in one asset register — with parts issued from the warehouse and technicians whose competence the system has already checked.
Eleven tools · Preventive and reactive · Issues spares from Inventory
Illustrative product view with sample data. Request a live walkthrough.
A standalone CMMS has its own asset list, its own people list and its own spares list. Keeping three lists in step is the actual job.
A request arrives as a call, gets written on a board, and its history exists only in the memory of whoever took it.
The plan says quarterly. The last one was seven months ago. Nothing raised its hand, because nothing was watching.
The technician takes what they need. Stock is wrong, the job cost is wrong, and the next planner works from both.
Reactive work, planned work, calibration and warranty — against the same assets.
Every piece of equipment as a record: what it is, where it is, and everything that has happened to it.
Reactive work raised by anyone, triaged, assigned and closed with what was done.
Time-based and meter-based plans that generate the work rather than relying on a reminder.
Instruments tracked with their calibration status, due dates and certificates.
Warranty status held with the asset, so claims happen while they are still valid.
Usage and failure data captured routinely, so reliability work has something to stand on.
And the same register drives the preventive work that stops the call happening.
Reactive, preventive, calibration and warranty in one module.
The equipment register — location, criticality, documents, warranty and full work history.
Reactive maintenance raised by anyone in the organization, from a phone, and triaged into work.
The forward view of planned and assigned maintenance work across assets and technicians.
Backlog, overdue preventive work, breakdown frequency and cost, on one screen.
Hours, kilometres and cycles recorded in the field to drive usage-based servicing.
Calibration schedules, statuses and certificates for instruments that must stay verified.
Claims raised against suppliers while the warranty is still live, linked to the failure that caused them.
A consistent vocabulary for what went wrong, which is what makes reliability analysis possible.
Standard task lists attached to planned jobs so the work is done the same way every time.
Time-based and meter-based plans that generate their own work orders on schedule.
The individual actions a plan produces, tracked to completion like any other work.
Here they are the same records the rest of the organization uses.
Parts issued to a job are stock movements, so the warehouse figure and the job cost stay true to each other.
Work is assigned to people whose certificates and training the platform already tracks, so competence is checked before dispatch.
Maintenance on live plant needs a permit — and the permit, the asset and the technician are all records in the same system.
Requester, planner and technician on one register.
Balances preventive plans against the reactive backlog and sees what is overdue before it becomes a failure.
Works from a job list on a phone, follows the checklist, issues the spares and records the failure code at closure.
Raises a request in seconds and can see where it sits, instead of ringing the workshop for an update.
Criticality, intervals and codes are yours — they are the whole reliability strategy.
| Setting | Value |
|---|---|
| Preventive trigger | Time + meter |
| Request raised by | Any member |
| Spares issue | From stock, mandatory |
| Failure code at closure | Required |
| Calibration warning | 30 days |